Friday, 20 May 2011

HOSPITALITY

“What is there more kindly than the feeling between host and guest?” Aeschylus, c 500 BC.

Correct. Absolutely. And what joy and gentle pride can be gained from engaging with a multitude of strangers, of sharing smiles and knowing their night is good from your engagement. In the world of hospitality “We aim to please” stands tall. Simple effort brings pleasure and warmth abounding.

And the flip-side?

“I’m a Centurion/Platinum/Diamond-Encrusted-Ermine-Bordered-Emerald-Enshrined Card Holder.”

“I’m a friend of Owner/Manager/A Celebrity.”

“You’re stupid/I’ll have you fired/Or a varied selection of Insult & Profanity abounding.”

And the most simple classic of all… “Don’t you know who I am?!”

Er… No. So?

Or… Yes. And?

It will never fail to, baffle, or better, simply to amuse how some folk think to attempt a rapid round of volatile diatribe to demean, criticise and attack will help them gain entry to somewhere after refusal. It won't. I've seen the 'Big I Am' a thousand times before. To be gracious and charming could be the only ploy to win, and could actually help one do so with relative ease. Insult my colleagues, you are not going anywhere but away.

Hospitality is the relationship between guest and host. It is, therefore, like all good relationships, inherently a two-way street. If the etymology comes from the Latin hostis, which originally meant ‘to have power’, then some people really need to wake up to where that power lies; certainly not in the hands of the intoxicated arrogant pomposity of the one who does not hold the key.

Of course, good manners often means you simply put up with other people's bad manners; if you spoke your true mind how little would they cope.

Manners are also a good balanced awareness of the feelings of others. If you have that awareness, you have good manners; if you don’t, you don’t. Simple.

As Johann Wolfgang von Goethe put it: “A man's manners are a mirror in which he shows his portrait.”

And who puts a portrait in their house they don’t like?

Monday, 16 May 2011

“It’s a Twister!”: The Tornado Mind

I was having a bit of a tough ride, the dark side generally beating over the light, bringing despondency, chaos, and all manner of internal conflict (which invariably, as it must, ripples out).

I’d actually put on my facebook page that very morning:

“The fight betwixt philosophy and genetic disposition of DRD4 exon III polymorphism is tough lately.”

And it seemed I was not sure why. It was too cryptic, or simply seeming of nonsense to those – most likely all – who would not know to what it referred. I was expecting no response. Hoped, yes, but expected, no. None came in the twenty-four hours it was there before I changed my status.

Of course, I did know why I had put it up; it was a cry for help. I wouldn’t need anyone to point out that a social networking tool was probably not the best place to express that, but in a flux of pained confusion I was desperate in my yearning to find inspiration, to have that cry heeded, even if I had made that very call so obtuse.

The crux of it all, however, is that people simply don’t want to know; or at best, they don’t fully accept and understand. Even if they do somehow get it, say they are there if you need, they’d really rather not. It eventually becomes clear to you that this is something that you to dealt with by yourself.

So, down to me. Oh fuck. Well, I’ll muddle on.

Then, one of the big breaking stories of the day:

‘Catherine Zeta Jones has received treatment for bipolar disorder…’

“After dealing with the stress of the past year, Catherine made the decision to check in to a mental health facility for a brief stay to treat her Bipolar II disorder.” said her publicist.

Now I am sure the illness of her husband had indeed been a immense worry, and however cosseted another’s life may be, I do not believe their suffering in this to be less than with anyone else; my sympathies truly.

Nor do I lack empathy for her having an internal battle within her own mind. How could I?

And I even accept what Mark Davies, from the mental health charity Rethink, said about her announcement, that it aides in removing the stigma around mental illness. Or rather, I’d like to believe that to be so, because removing the stigma can only be a good thing.

Will it though? Does it? I’m not so sure.

Yes, she will receive the best treatment, the most understanding. She’ll be shown all good will in accordance with the very basic fact that she has it and is Hollywood royalty. If she has a bad spell, she can take some much-needed ‘time out’, with whatever help she needs at the time. I’m not saying her journey is easy, but it is certainly more comfortable.

Her public declaration therefore is certainly commendable; but to be lauded as ‘courageous’ over it?

Yes, I think every one who lives with bipolar, or some other mental health issue, and endeavours to deal with it and live a full life despite of it is being courageous in some way. But most will not know empathy, acceptance, patience, understanding, compassion and care. Most will not be able to put life on hold whilst they take some time out to manage with it. Most will have to muddle on as best they can. Alone.

I know, because I am one of them. So yes, the recent revelations on Ms.Zeta Jones does have a relevance, because it opens the discourse right here.

Some years ago I was diagnosed with cyclothymia, part of the spectrum of Bipolar Disorder. I’m not going to go into the science behind this all, but in essence, it is a chemical imbalance that affects my moods, to put it mildly, regardless of outside stimulus; or serves to dominate my existence when being extreme.

I need to set forth here, for my own sense of worth more than to persuade any who should read this: I am an intelligent man, and a sane (as opposed to insane) one. I also believe I possess in me some of the best qualities to be found in a person. I am caring, not lacking in empathy, loyal, trusting, and insightful. I can be witty, hold my own in most topics of discussion, and can inspire myself and others to a better way of seeing. I can be rational and, for someone of an artistic nature, even logical. I enjoy literature and all the arts (which I believe to be the true magic in humankind’s expression). I enjoy philosophy, and believe the continuous application of wisdom in our lives to be good and right. The main issue for me is that there are times in my life when none of these qualities will resound in my being to even the slightest ring.

I can find myself overbearingly confused or anxious for no particular reason, or unable to make even the simple decision without things going round and round in my head.

“Oh, we all do that sometimes!” is what I am told. Really?

For hours, days, sound and silence combined screaming into the head, blocking out all reason?

I do love the company of others, and can be the life and soul of the party. But then I can suddenly find myself feeling intensely isolated and alone, wanting to remove myself from any interaction, compelled to numb myself utterly. I perhaps feel trapped in a bubble of disturbing hypersensitivity. I may literally just stare at the wall or my pillow or empty space, for hours or even days. I can be deeply pensive, agitated, depressed, or just a blank void.

“Oh, we all do that sometimes!” is what I am told. Really?

For hours, days, sound and silence combined screaming into the head, blocking out all reason?

When these times come, I have absolutely no motivation. I can't get out of bed, pick up a phone, don't eat properly and have the most erratic sleep patterns.

“Oh, we all…” How often would that be I’d ask you?

Or I’m told to get a grip, sort myself out. As if logic and reason are actually allies of mine at these times! It is actually kind of insulting. I have a condition, yes. I do not however lack intelligence or empathy, even if at such times either of those would seem alien to me.

Of course, sometimes it is all quite the opposite. It can be quite amazing. I become a fireball of enthusiasm and inspiration, full of ideas and goals. I feel fine, no, great, and I know how energy breeds energy, so focus to lift others with this too. Like He-Man, I hold up my hand and proclaim “I have the power!” Yes truly, The Force is strong in this one.

“Where is the bad in that?” you might say. To a certain degree and level, there is not. But just as the dark side of the journey can be overbearing in its power, so can this seemingly ‘light’ side.

This then is called the manic phase, or hypomania. And yes, it can indeed be quite wonderful. It can also be quite damaging too, as I get consumed with wild ideas, find myself acting in weird ways that hold no consequence, beyond any law of cause and effect. I’ll start getting things with money I don’t have and that I don't need, spending as if I’m Rockefeller and living as if invincible, pursuing highs that further me on.

I am aware this aspect, my inferno of light, sometimes gives cause for my friends and family to despair at how I'm not doing really well with some glittering career as actor, writer or world leader of my own plane. Especially as I can be seen so be so in command of a great untapped potential. However, it gives me more despair, for I invariably spiral into a bewildering state of being. I tell myself this is just the way I am and I have to learn to accept it. But I don’t want to. Not always.

These conflicting mood states are not only extremely tiring, they are also deeply frustrating. Not knowing how or when I am going to flux means I have grown to be deeply mistrusting of myself, and adopt many a mask to cover when I can. I can sometimes manage to operate despite the screaming inside. Other days, all is just fine. I'm someone who most find polite, chatty, understanding, honest, compassionate, mildly interesting, etc. I know I'm a decent man, I like who I am, and so do most who know me. I think.

There have been times in my life when this dis-ease of the mind has overpowered me. It has, in effect, won. There are other times when it has been defeated, when I have come out as victor, the captain and master of myself.

In the latter half of 2010, I believed that to totally be the case.

I’d felt pretty damn good for some months. Good days and bad days, like everyone, mistakes and successes, but pretty much doing ok.

Which is perhaps why this that you have read now, for the most part thus far written in the early months of that year, never saw the light of day; Cyclothymia, the tornado mind, was, it seemed to be, not something I really had to consider.

Then the start of a new year, 2011, and reality bit, and bit hard.

Without even seeing it, I had, at some indistinct point, slipped into a prolonged phase of hypomania. So productive in its existence it seemed, and so engaging it must have made me, no-one saw the signs of what a level I was at. And why would they? They had no reason to. As for me, riding along this huge crest of the wave that it is like a champion surfer, I would be the last person to question any negative aspects found in my behaviours. I would not, as is the wont when in the grip of this powerful state, even recognise it as such.

I had become unwatchful, unmindful, and the fall out of this could well prove personally catastrophic.

Of course, I only saw this when the flip came. Like someone had flung a switch.

I’d been in the grip of one cycle. Here was the next.

My entire outlook, inward and outward, changed.

It all became bleak, downcast. And I felt in the grip of despair: lost, confused, and the worst aspect, empty.

I hated how I now was. I also hated how I had been. I hated me.

I look to what I wrote at that time:

…I feel in the grip of despair: lost, confused, and the worse aspect, empty. I hate how I now am. I also hate how I have been. I hate me.

I put out a ‘why?’ to this, as if someone else is now reading and asking that very question, when really it must be a part of my own self throwing out that very question. It doesn’t make sense.

And that is just it. It doesn’t make sense.

I look, as I have so many times in the past, to beautiful words of gospel that I believe to be true.

As a rock on the seashore he standeth firm, and the dashing of the waves disturbeth him not. He raiseth his head like a tower on a hill, and the arrows of fortune drop at his feet. In the instant of danger, the courage of his heart sustaineth him; and the steadiness of his mind beareth him out.

Akhenaton (c. B.C. 1375)

The world is a looking glass, and gives back to every

man the reflection of his own face. Frown at it and it

will in turn look sourly upon you; laugh at it and with it, and it is a jolly kind companion.

Thackeray (1811-1863)

These truths, and many others I have collected as my armoury and allies over the years, still serve me, but I acknowledge it is with a slight respite that has no hold. The moment I stop reading, or writing, then any good is clouded over with a gloom that is so overwhelming. My reason is begging me to listen, I feel.

I read the words, written some two-thousand years ago, of Nagarjuna, the Tibetan Father of Mahayana Buddhism

The misery which follows pleasure

Is the pleasure which follows misery.

The pleasure and misery of mankind

Revolve like a wheel.

I know this to be true. But there is no peace in the pain of my head.

I tell myself ‘This too shall pass’. To breathe. To be at peace.

‘HELP ME!’ I cry out in my head.

And I re-read my blog entry written just a few hours earlier.

…Call on The Divine, but row with purpose away from the rocks.

I wrote this slight tweak of an old Indian proverb because, as is often the case when I feel rather low and lost, I’m pleading for some kind of guidance to bring me out of the dark, back into the light. And I must trust it will come. However, it can never come alone. When we find ourselves flailing in a storm that is the ocean of our life, seemingly uncontrollable waves bringing us closer to the rocks of despair, it is ultimately up to us to row damn hard in the opposite direction.

I know it to be so. And I know that I am about to make the choice to stop writing just now.

And fall darker still…

Now I am not making some “woe is me” plea. For one, I am one of the fortunate ones. I have many caring, loving people in my life, most of whom will accept this aspect of me as best they can. And I’ll say now, before I write one word further, I am truly thankful to them for that. I’m not ashamed in a wider sphere either, not in the sense that I keep it secret anyway; I’ll be quite vocal about it. I don’t shout it from the rooftops, discuss it with everybody, but I will speak of it. Because it is part of who I am; because prejudice needs to be broken. However, much shame still lives. Why?

Camilla Long, in her superb piece in The Sunday Times, was quite right when she put: “People are still frightened of mental illness in a way that I can only equate to a kind of racism.” I have heard much prejudice from all walks of life, even if not intentionally hurtful in its ignorance. And it is an ignorance everyone should work to dissolve within themselves, if only for the fact that one in four people suffer some kind of mental illness at some point in their lives. You are reading of me here, but it is pretty much guaranteed someone closer to you is to suffer such also.

I am always reminded of how difficult my condition is for others. They won’t hide that, because they can’t. So we can talk about it, but usually when I am doing ok; when I’m in the grip of it, when I am suffering my worst I must do so alone. No-one will take my hand and listen and say it is okay. They will simply not hear my cry for help, back away, get frustrated or tell me to deal with it.

I know the strength lies in me and me alone. Sometimes though, you need it from someone else. They can’t, because it scares them. So then you must choose not to burden them, and walk the terrifying journey alone, whilst still doing a job, earning a living, maintaining relationships etc. No time to step out, take a break, pause till it passes (for it will). In doing so you take one more step closer to ultimate isolation, something I feel very strongly when I’m slipping down. And that carries with it many negative consequences, of this I can testify.

I’m okay today. Where and how I’ll be tomorrow, or in the next hour, I cannot say. In the end though, we all must walk alone. The best I can hope to do therefore, indeed, the best any of us can endeavour to do at any time, is to breathe deep and remember the ancient wisdom in:

“This too shall pass”.

Monday, 9 May 2011


The world would be less without...


Alexander the Great...

Socrates...

Plato...

Hadrian...

St. Augustine...

Michelangelo...

Leonardo da Vinci...

Christopher Marlowe...

William Shakespeare...

Florence Nightingale...

Oscar Wilde...

Virginia Woolf...

Gertrude "Ma" Rainey...

George Gershwin...

Tennessee Williams...

Eleanor Roosevelt...

Andy Warhol...

Lily Tomlin...

Jodie Foster...

Ian McKellen...

Lilli Vincenz...

Derek Jarman...

Freddie Mercury...

k.d.lang...

Michael Stipe...

Alan Ball...


To name but a few.


AND probably about three to five we personally know, at least - let alone those we don't. Like it REALLY matters? Which it doesn't, yet STILL carries such prejudice.


True human rights cannot exist without freedom of expression. An unthinking, but all too real, censorship of essential human freedom exists - freedom is everyone's inherent right.


Sign this petition today.


http://www.allout.org/en/petition/uganda

Thursday, 6 January 2011

ROW WITH PURPOSE

‘Call on The Divine, but row with purpose away from the rocks.’

Prayer is said to be an act of communication between ourselves and the Divine. The Divine is whatever you believe or feel it to be.

Prayer can be expressed in words, in music, feelings or actions.

Prayer is hope, faith and a search for inspiration.

In one sense we are praying all the time, it is just that there are many different levels and types of prayer; we may not even class it as prayer, but just hold various wishes and desires that we would like to come true.

Prayer is not something that belongs to only those who follow a religion. After all, without wishing to offend, religion is really the creation of man, whereas spirituality is our connection with whatever we feel is divine.

I don’t really concentrate too much on theology or the metaphysics of life. Questions such as ‘what is God?’ or indeed, ‘is there a God?’ and ‘what will happen when I die?’ et al. These are, to me, questions that can never truly be answered.

Of course, I do believe it good for us to follow a philosophical path of enquiry into discovering our purpose, and to have hold within a strong value as to what is the 'Meaning of Life'. Which is anything that takes us towards feeling more contented and at peace; a greater sense of abundance in the areas of health, wealth and happiness resounding within us.

Having said that, I do believe in something, whatever that may be, connecting us all. It makes all of this here on Earth seem much more magical for a start. There is poetic joy to be found in the thread of synchronicity for one, and it happens to me too frequently for me to put it down to chance, or do anything other than welcome it. To do so would be to deny the inherent gift of intuition and insight. My only wish is that I perhaps gave more thought to the sign I find in such things, rather than what is a fleeting happy recognition of them at the time.

But back to my opening point; to call on The Divine, but row with purpose away from the rocks.

I wrote this slight tweak of an old Indian proverb because, as is often the case when I feel rather low and lost, I’m pleading for some kind of guidance to bring me out of the dark, back into the light. And I must trust it will come. However, it can never come alone. When we find ourselves flailing in a storm that is the ocean of our life, seemingly uncontrollable waves bringing us closer to the rocks of despair, it is ultimately up to us to row damn hard in the opposite direction.

Tuesday, 27 July 2010

MUSIC FOR TODAY, MUSIC FOREVER.


One of those days comes where I discover an artist that I have somehow missed, and I thus experience a revelation.

The artist is Janelle Monae, and even on paper, her inspired fusion of science fiction and old school soul would be enough to pique my attention.

‘Tightrope’ opens with her proclamation that she will “take your pain away”, and indeed she did, and does, and will undoubtedly do from herein. The lyrics and message of this track, combined with the most sublime ‘afrofuturist’ jive and funkiest horn section in Metropolis – “we call that Classy Brass!” – inject a truly wonderful feel-good factor. The accompanying video only intensifies the whole self-empowering party bliss of it all. I intend to keep tipping the tightrope, as best I can.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pwnefUaKCbc

Her new album The ArchAndroid was promptly ordered, and I awaited the arrival of it with considerable glee in my anticipation. In the interim, I relished in various offerings on youtube, including her beautiful rendition of the classic ‘Smile’.

Following on from her first solo ep, entitled Metropolis: The Chase Suite, she now brings us The ArchAndroid, which comprises of Suites II and III in her concept album quartet, all placed in the year 2719 in the megacity Metropolis.

This is the setting for Monae's alter ego, Cindi Mayweather, an android with “a rock-star proficiency package and a working soul” , who goes on the run after illegally falling in love with a human; and elevated to messiah status by her fellow kind.

“Accessibility is clearly a concern and Monae achieves it by firmly straddling her sci-fi evangelism with a supernova like display of talent and a giddy round of genre hopping.”

Charles Ubaghs, www.thequietus.com

Music artists can often bring us excitingly fresh creations when they draw passionately from the past, and here lies no exception. It is familiar and new in equal measure, like being wrapped up in your favourite blanket whilst doing high kicks on an underwater rollercoaster, in that it is a warming delight and hypnotic dream.

In a recent interview she said: “I'm busy on focusing on what I need to be doing; creating transformative music because I think that we're dying to be transformed. We're dying to hear an album that evokes emotions that we have not been in touch with for a long time, and that's why the ArchAndroid is an emotion picture. It promotes the individual and if you allow it to transform you, it will.”

Aiming to transcend, to become all that I am and more than I am is something I strive for, and I thank Janelle Monae for now becoming another arsenal in my army towards an ambitious further-accomplished self. Nietzsche once put it that “Without music life would be a mistake.” Well this enthralling creation of rhythm and poetry in the air ensures life is anything but.

I know for sure that what we dwell on is who we become.

Become the change you want to see - those are words I live by.

Oprah Winfrey

Wednesday, 21 July 2010

A Nightingale sang in Bloomsbury Square.

I didn’t know what to expect, or rather, didn’t have any expectations. Like many, I was now familiar with his sublimely slick old-school electro-soul smash. Familiar to the extent that I was often caught singing along to “’cause if you’re not really here, then I don’t want to be either. I want to be next to you… (all together now) Black and Gold, Black and Gold.” Instantly addictive, dark as it is shiny with it’s question on what is probably the biggest one of them all. Disco, but deep.


But other than this, I knew nothing of Sam Sparro’s music, and I accepted the possibility that the next hour or so might drag a little. It didn’t. Though I can’t comment on the albums prowress (I will, I promise), as a live act, as music to elevate you to move, to dance, Sparro is an accomplished songbird.


Growing up, Sam sang in church, and this clearly shows in that, like the best of live performers with a similar background, he can belt out with an extensive range and power. Of course, this rule doesn’t always apply. I myself was quite a gifted chorister but pop-success has somehow eluded me. Clearly, it has worked for him. With his father being a recording artist in his own right as well as a gospel minister, at an early age he was singing along with the likes of the Grammy-award winning Howard McCrary, and it was no doubt here the legendry Chaka Khan exclaimed “Damn, that white boy can sing!” Yes, with a three octave range that can take him from baritone to falsetto in an instant, he most definitely can.


From the moment he strutted on to the stage he had me hooked, and from the intensifying roar of the crowd after his opening number of ‘Too Many Questions’, I know I wasn’t alone. Clad in a black ensemble that was pure Gil Gerard’s ‘Buck Rogers’ ready to funk on down with Pamela Hensley, and a pair of over-sized white glasses that were matched by the whole band, three fierce backing girls included, Master Sparro rocked in with ferocious sensual soul. Here was music that was both familiar and new, and I had to dance, happily wearing Ardala’s horny head-piece had it been there. Boy, do I love a good space disco!


Obviously, launching as he is with his first album, there wasn’t a great canon of work to draw from, though as Sparro himself is heavily influenced by an abundance of eighties electro-soul and post-punk funk he easily stamped his mark as no one-hit wonder. He knows how to come up with a a good melody and a killer-chorus, a man equally at home being the producer as he is the exuberant showman, both the brains and the face. It was evident that he loves performing, and as his slight nods to the likes of Prince, Cameo, George Michael and the like pulsated along, he seemed genuinely touched and exhilarated by the ever-increasing warmth of the crowd.


Following the rousing chant and foot-stomping, he returned to the stage for his encore, sealing the deal with one fantastic tribute – with the “right on time” refrain from Loleatta Holloway’s ‘Love Sensation’, more often remembered as Black Box ‘Ride on Time’, and the equally unforgettable ‘Gypsy Woman’ of Crystal Waters with that “LaDaDee LaDeDa” hook. Everyone was to leave on the best of natural highs, having just seen a true showman near the start of his stratospheric climb. There is a smouldering sexuality there that, unlike many who have come before isn’t clouded by ambiguity, and I’m meeting more and more folk who have a little crush, which is a good thing for any rising pop star. And that is exactly what he is, bona fide pop. Loud, bold, glamorous and you know a little bit naughty. Young, undeniably rather fine on the eye and, for all his abundant homage to those whom have come before, still very much his own, Sam Sparro possesses ‘IT’, and I would not be at all surprised if his star remains in continuous ascension for quite some time to come.

Sam Sparro was at the Bloomsbury Ballroom, June 25th 2008


JUL272009

Gay Presidents, Gay Emperors, Gay Gods.

Back on the eve of the millennium, in her customary festive speech, The Queen quoted Winston Churchill. “The further backwards you look, the further forwards you can see.”Some people believe that the past is just that, and should be left there, only moving forward. Of course, I believe in the moving forward bit, but history need not be the tedium it may have been at school. Just take a look at the British Museum recently. First we had the fascination of the Emperor of Qin’s Terracotta Army; then followed ‘Hadrian: Empire and Conflict’. Hadrian was the Roman Emperor who built the second most famous wall of the ancient world, and I’ll get to him in a moment.


First, across the Atlantic and to the United States of America.


As the 2008 race pounded along for that prime place in the White House, there was no doubt that we were in the midst of one of the most exciting periods of U.S.A. political history. Throughout America’s growth into the Empire it is today, both women and African-Americans have taken on an arduous battle to achieve equal status with their white male counterparts. Even if the final outcome had proved to be John McCain, the fact that both Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama stood as prospective candidates undoubtedly proved them to be symbols of triumph over adversity.


Back on that December day in Alabama, when Rosa Parks refused to give up her seat on a bus and so took a monumental step for liberty, I doubt she or anyone believed that in just half a century a billionaire called Oprah would count as arguably one of most powerful and influential woman in the world, let alone that her country would vote in a black president.


Some may argue that it really shouldn’t matter what gender, race, or orientation the president is. That surely to focus on that seems rather archaic. The only thing to truly consider, ultimately, is: who is the best candidate for the job, who is best for the country, and indeed – though we over here hold no sway on the decision – best for the world. I’d like to imagine a world where at no point we were judged because of our religion, place of origin, colour, class, wealth, physical beauty or sexual history. That none of that was viewed as an indication of the person we were, could be, what we hold within: our spirit. But that is a utopia. Though there might not be so many whippings and lynching, racism and prejudice is still very much alive, albeit in a more psychological way. So the question of a female, or even farther reaching, a black Commander-in-Chief did and does matter, because it challenges the status quo, pushes boundaries, and perhaps even leads to some enlightenment.


So, what next? A gay president? Though American society may well have progressed to the point where it can seriously consider having a black or female president, it is still utterly unthinkable that what someone does in bed should not concern them. Some four million US citizens may have rallied together under a $20 million budget to fight Obama’s election, in fear that he’d remove their right to collect guns, but you can bet with full assurance that if his partner was Michael rather than Michelle the outcry against him would have been deafening. Yes, homosexuality is growing to be more accepted, and in a recent poll 55% of Americans said they would not object to a gay Commander-in-Chief (despite the current “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy of the armed forces), though I doubt many of those in favour came from the ‘Bible Belt’. In the big hangover of religious fervour, sex is still a big issue.


Not that it has ever held others back from holding the highest office. The previous incumbent of the White House, whilst not only having past issues with alcohol and cocaine, and in many eyes across the world being thoroughly ill-placed and just plain wrong, has managed to have scant attention paid to the alleged sex scandals that took place while he was Texas governor. Both women ‘disappeared’ – one by suicide, the other, well, she simply vanished.


Clinton had no such luck, memorably impeached for his fiasco with a cigar and a stain, but has subsequently gained a statesman-like quality that has had no ill-effect on his wife’s ambition and career. Franklin D Roosevelt quietly managed a hat trick of affairs whilst in office. Then, most famously, there is J.F.K. His are almost too numerous to mention: Marilyn Monroe, Angie Dickinson, Jayne Mansfield, the stripper Blaze Starr, mobsters molls and secretaries. Naturally, at the time these conquests were kept quiet, but we now know what a serious serial adulterer he was.


Yet perhaps the one that stands remarkable above all is Thomas Jefferson, whose affair with the African-American slave Sally Hemings produced six children. One would have thought that this alone would have moved the civil rights movement way ahead, but it still had some hundred and fifty years to come into being.


However, an important fact here is that, no matter the moral frowning at such actions, all these indiscretions involved women, and though some may wish to uphold the sanctity of marriage, sex between men and women is fine because it is the Judeo-Christian way. At least a quarter of Americans are evangelical Christians. With a good many of these you could do well to translate this as “fundamentalist”. Be it political or religious, with a prevailing ferocious intolerance of diversity, fundamentalism is always a problem, because unless you’re like them, agree with them, you’re not just wrong, you’re more or less worthless. It is not a quest or a defence of truth, fails to look inward, and its negative effects carry waves of violence throughout our world. As Soren Kierkegaard once put “The mind is like a parachute, it only functions properly when it is open.”


Whilst ‘fundamentalists’ may not necessarily have issues with women (or having relations with more than one at a time), or people of a different colour, they do generally have one with gay people, to the level of insipid hatred. Of course, they are also still screwing themselves over the shock 2006 revelation of Reverend Ted Haggard, ex-leader of the 30 million-strong National Association of Evangelicals, who, it was revealed, whilst vehemently condemning same-sex union was also enjoying methamphetamine and regular trips to a male prostitute. They subsequently spent a year trying to ‘cure’ him, and failed. Scratch a fundamentalist and you’ll often find a hypocrite.


There is already much consternation going in relation to Obama holding the interests of “radical homosexual activists” in high regard. His relaxation of certain ‘traditional’ values, ‘anti-biblical’ views on truth, sex, and family – it is both disturbing and very much out there.


Having said this, there have actually been, according to many sources, a couple of ‘gay’ presidents already. James Buchanan (the 15th President) lived for many years with William Rufus King, an Alabama Senator. The two men were considered inseparable. However, life was rather more ‘sanitised’ in regards to homosexuality in the 19th century, and rather like the Cary Grant/Randolph Scott bachelor pad set-up in the 1950’s, despite some hushed mockery behind closed doors, Buchanan’s infatuation was never deemed to be at the level of scandal, and due to the destruction of their personal correspondence, can only ever now stand as speculation.


Then old Abe himself. Abraham Lincoln and Joshua Fry Speed slept together nightly for four years in a shared bed above the store where Lincoln worked as a young man. Fair enough, this may have just been out of necessity and not held any sexual component, yet a handful of other men were, it has been suggested, also intimate with him: William Greene; Army Captain David V. Derickson (who frequently shared the president’s bed when his wife Mary was absent); Ephrim Elmer Ellsworth; A. Y. Ellis, who also ended up in his bed… Of course, some scholars say that it was all innocent and above board, yet many now concede that they cannot say he was not bisexual.


The absolute truth will never be assured, but suffice to say that as much as some vehemently deny such a possibility, some, those of an evangelical persuasion, now call for Lincoln’s face to be removed from the face of Mount Rushmore, replaced with say. Ronald Reagan. A female president? Not just yet. A black president? History has been made. A gay president? That is probably quite some time away yet.


But imagine if you will, for a moment, just that. A man taking the ultimate role in office, furthering his ‘empire’ as the forerunner in the world. Fed up with the guerrilla warfare after his predecessor engaged in a pointless war, he removes his troops from Iraq, and ushers in a new era of peace. He shows interest in all the lives of the all the millions who live under his rule, genuinely and personally concerned with their well being and improving their lives. A superb leader who had long gained the love and admiration of his military. General, Diplomat, Artist, Architect, Financier, Scholar, Poet, Philosopher, Athlete, Priest, Mystic, Traveller, Lover… a world leader of legendary stature. And a homosexual.


It was not uncommon in the classical age for a man to take male lovers alongside his wife, indeed it was generally deemed acceptable and, with the Greeks, the ultimate bond. However, what made Hadrian so unique was in making his love “official” in a way that no other Head of State has done before or since. I have long thought that, in some ways, the majority of the classical world had a far healthier approach to that universal matter of love and attraction then is so in this day and age. They certainly didn’t have it right, but philosophy was in its golden age and impacted on everything. To them, the concept of “straight” or “gay” would have seemed alien, if not ridiculous, and obsessing about ethnicity equally so. Sure, Romans were snobs when it came to cultural superiority, but skin colour was irrelevant. Woman too, though undoubtedly under the heel of patrician rule, had some status – for example, it was far easier for a wife to divorce her husband than the other way round.


Hadrian toured the world with his beloved Antinous constantly at his side. Whilst visiting Egypt, the young lover, whose only great claim was being the most beautiful vision of masculine perfection, drowned in mysterious circumstances. Consumed by grief, Hadrian lost any stoical tolerance and, in a wave of shocking violence, swept into Judea, slaughtered 500,000 Jews and re-named their homeland as Palestine; a rash move still haunting the world so deeply today. He also chose to immortalise Antinous in the form of a god, the only way he felt he could truly honour his lost love. He became not only the last god of the pagan world (and one the Catholic Church did its best to eradicate the memory of), but more statues were made of him than any other figure in Rome’s history (ironically, the most breathtaking of which now stands in the Vatican), and he was worshipped in some eighty countries for over six hundred years. Most of us these days don’t believe in the idea of human divinity, so this seems rather absurd to say the least. Yet when you consider how we seem to idolize beautiful celebrities tragically taken in the prime of their youth, perhaps the idea that Antinous took his ‘place among the gods’ seems less ridiculous. But what of a gay president?


Now in his second term of office, Paris has a gay mayor, Bertrand Delanoe, who may well lead the Socialist charge to France’s next presidential election, challenging Nicolas Sarkozy who, he accuses, “treads on individual freedoms and ignores collective freedoms.” If he manages to set such a precedent, perhaps the idea of the same happening in the U.S.A may become a little more plausible, after all there are already several openly-gay leading members of Congress who could step up to the challenge.


Once again, in reference to my earlier point as to why this should matter, in some ways it does not. But that would, I say, greatly depend on whether one has struggled under and had to fight against prejudice. It was little problem for Hadrian, so perhaps it is indeed a case that “the further backwards you look, the further forwards you can see.”

GILES ADDISON – 2008

Hadrian: Empire and Conflict was at the British Museum from the 24th of July through to the 26th of October 2008.

My play ‘LAST OF THE GODS’, about the relationship between Hadrian and Antinous, is available for production.